You're Not Building Too Slowly. You're Deciding Too Carefully.

I was on a call last week with a team of founders who had everything sorted.

Solid user research. Clear problem. Pages of features mapped out using the Hook Model.

But they were stuck.

"How do we know which interface to build? What features should we include first? What if we pick the wrong approach?"

They'd been in planning mode for six weeks.

Here's what I told them: You don't need better answers. You need to stop asking so many questions.

The Problem Isn't Your Product

If you've done your research, talked to users, and understand the problem you're solving, you probably already know enough to build something.

But you're waiting for certainty that will never come.

You want to know:

  • Which features will users value most?

  • What's the perfect user flow?

  • How should you handle edge cases?

  • What if users want something different?

These are all valid questions. But you won't know the answers until you build something and test it.

The team I was talking to had mapped out dozens of potential features for their app helping new mothers coordinate support. Meal planning, wellness tips, task management, communication tools.

All valuable. All important. All paralysing them.

The Standardisation Solution

Here's what I told them to do:

Strip it down to a simple framework:

  • 4-6 categories (household, food, emotional support, etc.)

  • 5 options per category

  • 3 phases (pregnancy, early postpartum, late postpartum)

That's it. A simple matrix that covers most needs without overwhelming users or developers.

"But what if mothers need more than 5 tasks per category?"

Then they'll tell you. After you've built it and they've used it.

"What if some mothers need different categories?"

Then you'll learn that. After you've tested it with real users.

"What if—"

Stop. Pick something and go with it.

Why Standardisation Beats Customisation (Initially)

When you're building your first version, every customisable option adds:

  • Development complexity

  • Testing surface area

  • Decision points for users

  • Maintenance burden

Instead of building a completely flexible system that handles every edge case, do this:

Pick 4-6 standard options that cover 80% of use cases.

Not because it's perfect. Because it's testable.

You can always add flexibility later once you understand which variations actually matter to users. But starting with too much customisation means you're building complexity before you've validated whether anyone wants the basic version.

How To Decide

When founders get stuck on MVP decisions, I have them answer these questions:

  1. What is the ONE core problem we're solving?

  2. What's the simplest possible solution to that problem?

  3. What can we standardise instead of customise?

  4. What features can wait until after we validate our core hypothesis?

  5. What's our best guess for now that we can test quickly?

That last question is crucial. Your first version is always a guess. The sooner you can test that guess with real users, the sooner you can improve it.

The team I was working with realised they'd been treating their planning as if it was the product. But planning isn't the product. The product is the thing users interact with.

And users can't interact with your carefully crafted Notion documents. 😉

An Embarrassment?

Your MVP should feel embarrassingly simple.

If you're not slightly uncomfortable with how basic your first version is, you're probably building too much.

Reid Hoffman, LinkedIn's founder, famously said: "If you are not embarrassed by the first version of your product, you've launched too late."

I've worked with founders who spent 18 months building their "MVP" only to discover their core assumption was wrong. Meanwhile, others who launched a simpler version in 8 weeks had already pivoted twice and found product-market fit.

The Permission You're Waiting For

Here it is: You don't need to have all the answers before you start building.

You need to have enough clarity to test one core assumption. That's it.

Make your best guess. Build the simplest version that tests it. Put it in front of real users.

They'll show you what's missing, what's confusing, and what actually matters.

But they can't show you any of that until you give them something to react to.

Until next time,
Cheers

PS — If you know a friend who’s stuck on their MVP, please forward this email to them or share your referral link! And if you're facing a similar dilemma, I'd love to hear about it - just hit reply.

Feedback corner!

😍 Did you like today’s issue? Ring this bell 🔔 so I can celebrate!

🤷‍♀ Did you think it was meh? Hit reply and lay your feedback on me!

🤩 Want more? Check out the video below!

Hiring explained in plain English for founders who need to work with developers

Quick legal note: This newsletter shares my experience and opinions, but it's not official financial, legal, or business advice. Every situation is different. Make your own decisions, do your own research, and consult professionals when you need them. You're the expert on your business.

Keep Reading

No posts found